|
Showing 1 - 5 of
5 matches in All Departments
This volume is intended for students and professionals in diverse
areas of the biological and biochemical sciences. It is oriented to
those who are unfamiliar with the use of physical methods in
studies of the biological elements. We hope the reader will find
the material a helpful reference for other volumes of this series
as well as the general literature, and some may see ways to adopt
these techniques in their own pursuits. Every effort has been made
to avoid an abstruse presentation. It should be clear that one
individual cannot be expert in all the disciplines considered here
(and the authors recognize that fact with sin cere humility). As
may be expected of an introductory reference, most of our attention
was focused on the commonly used methods. To balance this, we have
included a few examples of approaches which are promising but
relatively undeveloped at this time. Also, an emphasis has been
placed on element selectivity. It is impossible to envision the
course of future events, and a volume which deals with
instrumentation is especially prone to become outdated.
Nevertheless, any valid approach to a scientific question should be
applicable indefinitely."
Awarded Finalist for Best First Novel, 2014 Spur Awards of the
Western Writers of America. La Grulla is a bold story of impetuous
youth, uncommon friendship, and timeless romance, unfolding in the
stunning American Southwest. A violent confrontation with the
vaquero Jaime Lucero on a cold November 1882 morning in Taos leaves
young Jeff Cameron relentlessly pursued. While no one's fool,
strong Maggie MacTeague is drawn into this survival struggle, and
into the love of her life. Savor the wry humor of the frontier
Scotsman, Sandy, distinguished equally in battle and in
whiskey-fueled fun. Your heart will stop as the story resolves in
Jeff's final, desperate ride on the remarkable Bonnie Blue.
Legalized Killing examines the self-defense laws of America,
especially the so-called castle laws of states like Texas and
Oklahoma, where citizens can use deadly force even if they merely
think they are threatened, which in hindsight might not be true.
These laws supposedly protect citizens from prosecution if they
injure or kill an intruder in self-defense, and they also disallow
civil lawsuits against the one defending. But there is an inherent
weakness in these laws, which can be found in the answer to a
simple question: was it genuine self-defense, where the choice was
shoot or die, or was the incident suspicious, clearly not necessary
or related to a dispute between the individuals involved? Applying
this question to real life incidents finds that many so-called
self-defense shootings were not true life or death necessities, yet
the one doing the shooting was nevertheless protected by the castle
law. These laws could be in conflict with other laws and
constitutional provisions. There is no statute of limitations for
murder; do these laws create an exception? Is the denial of legal
redress to survivors even constitutional? In some states deadly
force can be used almost anywhere, e.g., on the road, at a park, at
the workplace, etc -- any place a person has a right to be. These
laws no doubt protect some who are forced to defend their lives,
but they also pose a hazard to other individuals; they almost
invite murders and a trigger-happy mentality from certain elements
of society. Meter readers and children who wander into a neighbor's
yard are put at risk. Legalized Killing takes note of the
variability of justice, as evidenced by examples where the laws
apparently worked correctly and others where they failed miserably.
Legislators, members of the legal and law enforcement communities
and private citizens alike share in the substantial ignorance of
what can or cannot be done in a self-defense situation, or better
stated, what should or should not be done. Misconceptions of what
is allowed thus create the dangers. Very few citizens actually know
what the statutes contain, and that has led to unwarranted
shootings. For example the use of deadly force to defend property
is not allowed. A couple in Texas killed a seven year old boy who
was going to the bushes to urinate, thinking that the Texas law
allowed it Awareness of such dangers, a hopeful outcome of this
book, can actually save lives by steering individuals away from the
castle law situation, because there are ways to get into it in
total innocence (and very quickly). Similarly, if those who think
the castle laws give them a license to kill are caused to realize
that a court's decision of justifiable homicide is not a sure
outcome, perhaps better judgment will be used. There are many books
devoted to the subject of using weapons in self-defense, but
Legalized Killing focuses on the problems posed by the castle laws.
Only two chapters of Legalized Killing examine the reasons why
people own guns along with the nature of the criminal intruder and
the actual use of a gun. The book would not be complete without a
consideration of those issues. The other eight chapters examine the
main focus: failures of the castle laws, the factors that cause the
self-defense situation, a comparison of self-defense laws
state-by-state and a forum of quotations that reveals the level of
ignorance that exists in 2011. The book's emphasis is upon
avoidance of trouble and using good judgment. It is well worth
knowing about these laws because they have the potential to affect
everyone, young or old, rich or poor, innocent or criminal-minded,
often with fatal consequences.
Legalized Killing examines the self-defense laws of America,
especially the so-called castle laws of states like Texas and
Oklahoma, where citizens can use deadly force even if they merely
think they are threatened, which in hindsight might not be true.
These laws supposedly protect citizens from prosecution if they
injure or kill an intruder in self-defense, and they also disallow
civil lawsuits against the one defending. But there is an inherent
weakness in these laws, which can be found in the answer to a
simple question: was it genuine self-defense, where the choice was
shoot or die, or was the incident suspicious, clearly not necessary
or related to a dispute between the individuals involved? Applying
this question to real life incidents finds that many so-called
self-defense shootings were not true life or death necessities, yet
the one doing the shooting was nevertheless protected by the castle
law. That kind of outcome shows a serious weakness. In some states
deadly force can be used almost anywhere, e.g., on the road, at a
park, at the workplace, etc -- any place a person has a right to
be. These laws no doubt protect some who are forced to defend their
lives, but they also pose a hazard to other individuals; they
almost invite murders and a trigger-happy mentality from certain
elements of society. Meter readers and children who wander into a
neighbor's yard are thus put at risk. Legalized Killing takes note
of the variability of justice, as evidenced by examples where the
laws apparently worked correctly and others where they failed
miserably. Legislators, members of the legal and law enforcement
communities and private citizens alike share in the substantial
ignorance of what can or cannot be done in a self-defense
situation, or better stated, what should or should not be done.
Misconceptions of what is allowed thus create the dangers. Very few
citizens actually know what the statutes contain, and that has led
to unwarranted shootings. For example the use of deadly force to
defend property is not allowed. A couple in Texas killed a seven
year old boy who was going to the bushes to urinate, thinking that
the Texas law allowed it Awareness of such dangers, a hopeful
outcome of this book, can actually save lives by steering
individuals away from the castle law situation, because there are
ways to get into it in total innocence (and very quickly).
Similarly, if those who think the castle laws give them a license
to kill are caused to realize that a court's decision of
justifiable homicide is not a sure outcome, perhaps better judgment
will be used. There are many books devoted to the subject of using
weapons in self-defense, but Legalized Killing focuses on the
problems posed by the castle laws. Only two chapters of Legalized
Killing examine the reasons why people own guns along with the
nature of the criminal intruder and the actual use of a gun. The
book would not be complete without a consideration of those issues.
The other eight chapters examine the book's main focus: failures of
the castle laws and their conflicts with other laws, the factors
that cause the self-defense situation, a comparison of self-defense
laws state-by-state and a forum of quotations that reveals the
level of ignorance that exists in 2011. The book's emphasis is upon
avoidance of trouble and using good judgment. It is well worth
knowing about these laws because they have the potential to affect
everyone, young or old, rich or poor, innocent or criminal-minded,
often with fatal consequences.
|
You may like...
Morbius
Jared Leto, Matt Smith, …
DVD
R179
Discovery Miles 1 790
|